Re-use of a Prohibited Name and Directors’ Personal Criminal/Civil Liability

6th June 2013

The tough economic times of recent months now appear to be gradually easing which is great news for businesses across the corporate spectrum. The Insolvency Service’s published figures show that in the first quarter of this year (2013) there were 3,619 liquidations, approximately 71% of which were creditors’ voluntary liquidations. This figure represents a 15.8% fall on figures for the same quarter in 2012. Other corporate insolvencies including administrations were down 27.5% for the same period.

Notwithstanding the above, company directors, particularly those of recent insolvent companies, and creditors of insolvent companies should be aware of sections 216 and 217 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (the “Act”) in the aftermath of the insolvency epidemic.

Where a company enters an insolvency event, the directors often wish to continue trading in the same industry or sector in which the insolvent company operated. This ties in neatly with the office holder’s desire and statutory duties to realise the insolvent company’s assets for the benefit of the insolvent company’s creditors. This often creates the opportunity for a vehicle managed by the existing management team to purchase the assets back from the office holder at a reduced value due to the insolvency, however, a sale at a reduced price usually still represents a better realisation than a complete break up sale of the assets. The purchasing vehicle then often continues to trade using the same or a similar name to that of the insolvent company.

Section 216 will apply to those individuals who were directors (including shadow directors) of a company that enters liquidation in the period of 12 months ending with the day before it went into liquidation. This includes companies that first enter administration but that proceed into liquidation. There is, of course, no guarantee that this will occur.

Section 216(3) provides that:

“Except with leave of the court or in such circumstance as may be prescribed, a person to whom this section applies (i.e. you) shall not at any time in the period of 5 years beginning with the day on which the Liquidating Company went into liquidation:

(a) be a director of any other company that is known by a prohibited name;

(b) in any way, whether directly or indirectly, be concerned or take part in the promotion, formation or management of any such company; or

(c) in any way, whether directly or indirectly, be concerned or take part in the carrying on of a business carried on (otherwise than by a company) under a prohibited name.”

For the purposes of section 216, any name by which the Liquidating Company was known at any time in that 12 month period or a name so similar to that name so as to suggest an association with the Liquidating Company will be a prohibited name.

Section 216(4) provides that if a person acts in contravention of this section, he is liable to imprisonment or a fine, or both.

Furthermore, section 217 provides that a person is personally responsible for all the relevant debts of a company if at any time he is involved in the management of the company in contravention of section 216, or acts, or is willing to act on instructions given (without leave of the Court) by a person whom he knows at that time to be in contravention in relation to the company of section 216.

Relevant debts are those debts of the company incurred at a time when that person was involved in the management of the company, and that person will be jointly and severally liable in respect of those debts with the company and any other person who, whether under section 217 or otherwise, is so liable.

Example Scenario

Mr Smith and Mr Jones (the “Directors”) are directors of S J Roofing Limited (“SJR”). SJR encounters financial difficulties when one of their main customers enters insolvent liquidation and fails to pay a large debt due to SJR.

The Directors seek insolvency advice and they are advised that due to the company being unable to meet its debts as they fall due, and their duties as directors not to trade SJR whilst insolvent, SJR should be placed into voluntary liquidation. The Directors resolved to call a creditors’ meeting pursuant to section 98 of the Act and SJR is duly placed into liquidation in June.

The Directors are also directors of another company called S J Roofing & Guttering Solutions Limited (“SJRGS”) which they had incorporated 12 months ago with a view to diversifying and expanding into the guttering market, but they had not got round to doing so and SJRGS had therefore not traded or filed accounts other than dormant accounts.

The liquidator of SJR advises that they can buy the assets back from him in the liquidation and they see this as the perfect opportunity to take the business forward and so they duly agree for SJRGS to enter into an agreement to purchase the assets from the liquidator. They duly begin trading SJRGS.

By Mr Smith and Mr Jones being directors of SJRGS and trading using that name they are in breach of section 216 of the Act. Not only do they become criminally liable and open to investigation and prosecution by the Department for Business Innovation and Skills immediately that they begin trading, but they also become personally jointly and severally liable for the debts of SJRGS.

Further, as section 216 applies to the use of a prohibited name, where directors of a liquidating company also hold directorships in other group companies with similar names to that of the liquidating company, then they may be in breach of the Act by virtue of those other directorships immediately upon the insolvent group company entering liquidation.

Section 216 can also apply to trading names by which the insolvent company was known within the period of 12 months prior to insolvent liquidation and is not restricted to the registered company name by which the company is known at Companies House.


The above is important to company directors, particularly of recent insolvent companies, where they may be concerned that they have not been advised about section 216. With the correct advice, there are actions which directors can take to protect themselves from personal liability. It is important that directors seek advice as early as possible as the options available will be greater. We are able to advise directors on the most appropriate steps which they can take.

Section 216 may also be of interest to creditors of insolvent companies where historically they have traded with a ‘phoenix’ company which has become insolvent as section 216 may give recourse to them to recover their debt, where previously they might have assumed they had no choice but to prove in the insolvency for a pro rata distribution in the event that there are any realisations. We can advise creditors where they believe they may have an eligible debt on how to go about pursuing that debt.

Related Blogs

View All